Page 25 - APEC CLIMATE CENTER 2025 Annual Report
P. 25

APEC CLIMATE CENTER  2025 ANNUAL REPORT



 Highlighted   The five improved impact indices go beyond simple meteorological statistics to provide   Highlighted   6.  Evaluation of Heatwave and Drought Predictability

 practical decision-support information directly linked to productivity improvement and   Using DCPP Prediction Models over East Asia
 Achievements   management stability in the agricultural field.  Achievements
 in 2025  First, it enables data-driven precision agriculture planning. By utilizing the standardized   in 2025  ㉖  Ms. Daeun Jeong (downy@apcc21.org)       Dr. Hyun-Ju Lee (asteria1104@apcc21.org)

 'Growing Degree Days (GDD)' and the quantitatively calculated 'Growing Season Length
 (GSL),' farmers can accurately forecast optimal timings for each growth stage, from germi-
                                                Recently, East Asia has experienced a rapid increase in the frequency and intensity of ex-
 nation to flowering and harvest. This allows farmers to determine the appropriate timing
                                                treme hydrometeorological disasters, such as heatwaves, droughts, and floods, driven by
 for fertilization and irrigation to enhance product quality and scientifically assess shifts
                                                the acceleration of climate change. To proactively respond to the climate crisis and mini-
 in suitable cultivation areas or the feasibility of double cropping due to climate change,
                                                mize socio-economic damage, securing reliable mid-to-long-term prediction information
 enabling preemptive preparation of future cropping systems.
                                                                                                         1)
                                                on a decadal scale is essential. In particular, the Decadal Climate Prediction Project  (DCPP),
                                                a core initiative of the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP), is an innovative system
 Second, it contributes to energy efficiency and cost reduction for facility farmers. The
                                                that projects the climate for the next decade by incorporating observed initial conditions
 newly introduced 'Facility Heating Degree Days (HDD)' accurately predicts winter heating
                                                into climate models. While its potential for global climate risk management is highly rec-
 energy demand for greenhouses by considering the critical growth temperature for each
                                                ognized, systematic diagnosis and verification of its performance regarding East Asian ex-
 crop. This not only assists smart farms and facility horticulture farmers in significantly re-
                                                tremes remain insufficient. Therefore, this study aims to precisely diagnose the character-
 ducing energy costs by minimizing unnecessary heating but also serves as a crucial basis
                                                istics and limitations of the DCPP prediction system. By providing essential baseline data
 for quantitatively assessing the impact of greenhouse gas reduction in the agricultural
                                                for enhancing forecast reliability and developing bias correction technologies, this research
 sector at the national level.
                                                seeks to contribute to establishing an effective framework for climate disaster response.
 Third,  it  minimizes  agricultural  damage  from  meteorological  disasters.  'Chill  Days,'
                                                All five DCPP prediction systems consistently exhibit positive biases (model values exceed-
 which reflect daily meteorological data, provide sophisticated predictions for fruit tree
                                                ing observations) across East Asia when predicting heatwave frequency indices of warm
 dormancy break and flowering times, enabling preparation against spring frost damage
                                                    2)
                                                                       3)
                                                days (TX90p) and warm nights (TN90p). These indices show high sensitivity to warming,
 caused  by  abnormal  low  temperatures.  Additionally,  the  'Livestock  Heat  Index  (THI),'
                                                with biases intensifying as forecast lead time increases. In contrast, the intensity indices—
 which reflects thresholds for each livestock type (cattle, pigs, chickens), provides specific
                                                                                     4)
                                                annual maximum of daily maximum temperature  (TXx) and annual maximum of daily
 risk information in 5 levels (Normal to Fatal). This significantly strengthens the risk man-
                                                                 5)
                                                minimum temperature  (TNx)—generally show negative biases (model values lower than
 agement capabilities of livestock farmers by mitigating livestock stress and preventing
                                                observations). The upward trends in heatwave indices simulated by the models are over-
 mass mortality during summer heatwaves.
                                                estimated compared to observations, with particularly pronounced increases in TX90p
                                                and TN90p after the 2000s. Predictability analysis indicates that frequency-based indices
                                                exhibit higher skill than intensity-based indices; notably, MPI-ESM1-2-HR demonstrates high
              Glossary                          correlations and low errors for heatwave frequency indices. In contrast, CMCC-CM2-SR5
                                                shows low predictive skill across all heatwave indices, with negative correlations for TN90p.
            1) DCPP:
                                                Overall, models exhibiting relatively robust predictive performance may allow the direct use
               Decadal Climate Prediction Project  of uncorrected forecasts, whereas models characterized by strong warming trends and sub-
                                                stantial biases would require bias correction based on observed trends.
            2) TX90p (Warm days):
                                                The  drought  prediction  performance  of  the  DCPP  systems  was  rigorously  evaluated
              Number of days when daily maximum
                                                through both deterministic and probabilistic verification, spanning lead times from in-
              temperature  is  greater  than  the  90th
              percentile                        dividual years to multi-year averages of three, five, and nine years. While most models
                                                exhibited  a  positive  precipitation  bias,  predictive  performance  improved  significantly
                                                when transitioning from single-year forecasts to multi-year average assessments. These
            3) TN90p (Warm nights):
                                                results  empirically  demonstrate  that  the  DCPP  systems  possess  a  distinct  strength  in
              Number of days when daily minimum
                                                capturing the long-term decadal mean state rather than predicting the specific climate
              temperature  is  greater  than  the  90th
                                                variability of a single year. Furthermore, the study revealed clear discrepancies in perfor-
              percentile
                                                mance among the models depending on the verification framework utilized. Specifically,
                                                MIROC6 demonstrated the highest skill in deterministic verification, whereas CanESM5
            4) TXx:
                                                excelled in probabilistic verification. These distinct performances are attributed to the
              Annual maximum value of daily maxi-  unique error characteristics and internal physical mechanisms inherent in each individ-
              mum temperature
                                                ual climate model. Consequently, the findings indicate that a uniform bias correction ap-
                                                proach applied across all models is insufficient for fundamentally enhancing the accuracy
            5) TNx:                             of DCPP-based drought information. Instead, the research emphasizes the necessity of
              Annual maximum value of daily mini-  implementing customized calibration methods that account for the specific prediction
              mum temperature                   characteristics and error profiles of each model.
                                                                                                             25
 24                                                                                                          25
 24
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30